274
It subsequently transpired that the Registrar had put it in the Court file of a suit then pending in which the question had arisen. This was a mistake which a junior clerk ought not to have committed, and it caused much inconvenience. I have no doubt that this was a case in which it was my duty to reprimand the Registrar. Of course, if I considered the case of carelessness sufficiently grave I should report it. I am not very clear on the point, but I fancy that Your Excellency's contention is that I have not even this right.
17. In paragraph 8 of Your Excellency's Despatch, Your Excellency says that the Chief Justice has no power not conferred on him by Ordinance to interfere in the Executive and administrative work of the Registry, "as long as it is carried on to his satisfaction, and if he has cause of complaint his remedy is to report it to the Governor". The reference to Ordinances is, I venture to think, disposed of; for either they have no reference to the Registrar's duties as Registrar, or they do not refer to the question at all. The work of the Supreme Court involves a considerable amount of routine detail, and a staff is appointed to perform it; an officer, the Registrar, is put in charge of that staff; but it is impossible to sub-divide
ETS
274
beno z I ma dir •Tanzałyeń øic of #te I
find it. It subsequently transpired that the Registrar had
to novou or bualɔn9x9 I t
(
put it in the Court file of a suit then pending in which
ad one com #tuona shell yen dana galvosnih ud Ionen60
bonevuoɛih 1 yameost ezlup brA renzakoedt gemeet as ad ̃uoð
ོ་ག་
Lavou s mrihsen zuroù në 181ðdalyeā youget wrið
Santo ne pricao, to mut bibe a el dolly,bun
niens mron ti bumers uz bērtuner ad jon blow realto
640
i ama bubin-chon sú víbtre meo di vienare
OW domo era gižemotreg to Aldísquo ator Taxrate
the question had arisen. This was a mistake which a junior
clerk ought not to have committed, and it caused much
inconvenience. I have no doubt that this was
a case in
which it was my duty to reprimand the Registrar. Of course,
if I considered the case of carelessness sufficiently
grava I should report it. I am not very clear on the point
>
but I fancy that Your Excellency's contention is that I
0
syss Jon bimore Iudżona ́S
have not even this right.
17.
In paragraph 8 of Your Excellency1s Den-
५० 741
ANİSHOT USE OF
I seart CIA
ririw haroseton vidə"requent at požiw (endako eris to ЯOW
shinka neritono: le xo`! I tentremt to -olc (nail: ba sila
Thour groð manngua mia rẺ exactš mund to noževdirsalh ads
zzeter Nokriw. :EVAC to 6 .olt annexib~0 to SE .P bus ad .2
Lig
Azt to tok enisport to Istofthe co
20 DOPLE MOLD*
210V en Jaro Ant ES TATTAM A afgeta oa ui nevi .zUEMPTAQ"
maller for oris en feter an et for zoo enthu ofa to
1
C
tavte 3 to ÖstersĊ-frettol en
math wore [Tiw siVMAX®
-patch Your Excellency says that the Chier Justice has no
power not conferred on him by Ordinance so interfere in
the Ixecutive and administrative work of the Registry, "ac
long as it is carried on to his satisfaction, and if he
has cause of complaint his rumedy is to report it to the
Governor". The reference to Ordinances is I venture to
think disposed of; for either they have no reference to the
Registrar's duties as Registrar, or they do not refer to
the question at all. The work of the Supreme Court involves
BL
97 167/hl z 07
711ter,sofobnova87109 drsant omUG
a considerable amount or routine detail, and a staff is
M 209LCUN
S10 Toseooobeny ni
g noc: Inw ynsetqua
appointed to perform it; an officer, the Registrar, is put
dan bixon Dite ¿ATSUZAľ to viİt vig tot oren I
bit
t
in charge of that staff; but it is impossible to sub-
-divide
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.